by Jim Tarbell

After the rousing launch of our map of the Economy for the Common Good in Mendocino County on April 29 with Emily Kawano and Keith Taylor, we quickly began the process of capturing that energy and launching the whole project into the future. On May 19, over two dozen citizens dedicated to fulfilling the promise of the Economy for Our Common Good, gathered to outline all of the issues, projects and campaigns that need to be part of the new economy. These themes were then taken up by a larger public gathering on June 15 that covered many issues involved in Building the Economy for Our Common Good. 

We began with a great communal singing of the Melanie DeMore song Lead with Love, which led into testimonials from organizations already on the map and a community-base media group aiming to be citizen-driven and worker-owned. From there we broke into three groups looking at:

• Issues around the availability and affordability of housing and the viability of establishing a Community Land Trust to ensure long-term affordable housing;
• Our natural commons and the state of restoration forestry, including pushing the County to enforce a publicly passed ordinance that “put a wrench in the longstanding timber-management practice” of using carcinogenic chemicals to kill hardwood trees. We also discussed how to support the County’s newly formed Climate Action Advisory Committee; 
• Establishing co-ops and collectives in the County and organizing a regular media presence for presenting current news on our progress  in Building the Economy for the Common Good in Mendocino County.

At the conclusion of the gathering we also outlined plans to hold more workshops at Mendocino College, concentrating on both adding organizations to and expanding our Map of the Economy for Our Common Good, as well as exploring new issues and campaigns necessary for a robust Economy for the Common Good and the development of new organizations to fulfill that promise.

As we ere breaking up, one enthusiastic participant exclaimed, “this is the best meeting I have been at in years. We did not just talk, we came up with actions to do.”

Not in Mendocino County? Visit this page for information on the Grassroots Institute's solidarity economy mapping curriculum, and consider organizing to create a similar map where you live. 

by Bonnie Preston

Since Maine’s town meeting season of 2011, 55 towns have passed the Local Food and Community Self Governance Ordinance (LFCSGO), which gives small farmers who sell directly to their customers an exemption to licensing and inspection requirements.

For some reason, the Maine Municipal Association (MMA), a statewide membership organization which provides an array of services to assist municipalities in their governance, has never supported the LFCSGO. The MMA doesn't set policy, but instead supports needs that are frequently beyond the scope of what small towns in particular can do for themselves. Yet they have recently recommended a seriously modified version of the LFCSGO to towns that ask for their advice on this issue.

On March 16, the Portland campus of the University of Southern Maine hosted the Maine Hunger Summit, and Local Food Rules was there.

Conference organizers invited us to participate to give our perspectives on how food sovereignty, or the ability of communities to control land use, production of food, and how it is sold or otherwise distributed--can help address hunger. Our two presentations drew an audience mostly made up of students. They listened intently, asked good questions, and stayed around after the presentations to talk with us.

One of our presenters, Suzanne Dunham, was the lead organizer for passing a Local Food and Community Self Governance ordinance in her town of Greenwood, Maine. Suzanne manages the local farmers market with her husband. She recounted how several people have used their town's ordinance, which allows unlicensed farmers to sell face-to-face with customers, to test a product to judge if it might be worthwhile to get licensed so it can be sold through more conventional retail channels. At least one farmer has moved from farmer's market to store distribution, adding to her family's financial well-being as well as adding economic development to the town. Other farmers and home-based food producers in town are simply happy to be able to use the farmers market for some legal extra income.

Craig Hickman, a Maine state representative who is a small farmer and B&B owner, told about his efforts to add a right-to-food amendment to the state constitution. This would ensure people's rights to feed themselves on a local level, bringing aspects of the Local Food Community Self Governance Ordinance statewide. 

Jesse Watson, a permaculturist, talked about how the intense focus of permaculture on improving the soil will enable more people to grow their own food, providing greater resilience to our food system.

Sonia Acevedo has a micro-farm in a poor town, and convinced people that farmers markets are not just for the elite. She said that in her town, poor people buy food from poor farmers, and it works; no one goes hungry.

Matthew Hoffman, head of the Food Studies Program at USM, is looking for more ways to connect us with his students. We were delighted to present to these committed young people, and look forward to future collaboration. Urban meets rural will be a win-win!

California Governor Gavin Newsom is taking "unprecedented steps" to block President Trump's attempts to send water to San Joaquin Valley's agriculture interests. In the fight to protect the Delta's water, fishery and ecosystems, not to mention the drinking water of 25 million Californians, California has temporarily stopped deferring to the federal government on environmental rules, and is drawing up its own regulations. Newsom's move will potentially add a court showdown over whether the federal government has to comply with state law to the 45 lawsuits the state has brought against the Trump administration on other issues.

The question has also gone to the Legislature, with California Senate Bill 1 requiring the federal government's actions on water to comply with the state's Endangered Species Act. You can read more here, including how some federal environmental officials feel caught in the middle between the state and the White House.

Newsom's focus on protection hasn't gone unnoticed. In this commentary by Don Nottoli, a Sacramento County supervisor and chair of the Delta Counties Coalition, and Bill Dodd, a CA senator representing the Delta, Newsom is praised for rejecting the twin tunnels proposal and thereby calling for a more thoughtful process to conserve water and preserve the Sacramento Delta while also addressing irrigation needs. They praise Newsom's openness to "a more holistic approach that could include alternatives like water use efficiency measures, levee restoration, additional storage and other local projects supported by the Delta Counties Coalition."
​
They note that while the two-tunnel project was rejected, a single tunnel plan is still on the table, though its impacts have not been studied and there are no details about its size, location, cost or operation. What is certain, though, is that a tunnel alone won't be a sustainable solution for California water needs. "The funds allocated for tunnels would be better spent on regional portfolio-based measures, including strengthening levees, restoring ecosystem habitat, increasing water use efficiency, developing local and regional water supplies, and providing additional surface and groundwater storage and recharge." they write. "This winter’s storms underscore how much excess runoff we could have captured for future droughts and retained if we had more reservoir and groundwater recharge projects completed."

by Jim Tarbell

It is going to be a busy spring for the Grassroots Institute in Mendocino County, California. We are working toward introducing our solidarity economy mapping project to the public. This interactive, online map, detailing the Economy for Our Common Good in Mendocino County, features the business, non-profit, government and citizens groups that are already at work supporting a local economy that works for both people and planet. We are also planning how we can best introduce this mapping tool into neighboring counties.  In order to accomplish our first goal we are finalizing the data on over five dozen organizations that will be on the initial map. That is only a small portion of the over 200 organizations that have been nominated to be on the map. Adding and updating the map will be an on-going, ever-changing process.

In order to share this process with citizens and groups across the country we are finishing up a study guide on the year-and-a-half experience of creating the map. We will put that up on our website at grassroots-institute.org along with a link to the map, a sample video of the interviewing process for map-worthy organizations, and information on two upcoming events where we will be introducing the Economy for our Common Good mapping project and discussing how to incorporate more geography and data.

The first event will be the conference on "Post Capitalism: Building the Solidarity Economy" at Humboldt State University in Arcata CA on April 26 and 27. Emily Kawano, the founder of the US Solidarity Economy Network and our adviser on our mapping project, will be a keynote speaker at that conference. The Grassroots Institute will also present a workshop to help communities map their local solidarity economy that is already in existence.

Then Emily Kawano is coming down to Mendocino County for the grand public presentation of our map and all the organizations on it that are building an economy for the common good.  We'll also be holding a roundtable community discussion on building co-ops and collectives in Mendocino County. We are excited to be able to bring the diversity and vitality of our local solidarity economy into clearer view for Mendocino residents, and we hope that what we've done will be an inspiration to activists in other parts of the country to do the same where they are.

Jim Tarbell is editor of the Alliance journal, "Justice Rising: Grassroots Solutions to Corporate Power," a former host of "Corporations and Democracy" and a facilitator and instructor at the Grassroots Institute.

Congratulations to the people of Toledo OH, who recently amended their city charter to give legal standing to Lake Erie, the first time such recognition has been accorded to an entire ecosystem.

The victory follows years of collaboration between Toledoans for Safe Water and the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, as well as decades of regulatory failure and recent severe algal blooms. Opponents included big agricultural interests represented by the Chamber of Commerce and the Farm Bureau. The lake is the primary source of drinking water for Toledo, so its health impacts the health of some 300,000 people on its shores. In 2014, more than 100 people were sickened by algae which had proliferated thanks to agricultural run-off. 

The Alliance has also played a role in the movement to gain legal standing for nature. Back in 2005, the Alliance for Democracy's Defending Water for Life campaign brought the CELDF strategy of rights-based ordinances to Barnstead NH where citizens were organizing to prevent bottled water companies from privatizing their water. By the following spring, the citizens passed the first ordinance in the country to declare...

“...We the People of the Town of Barnstead declare that we have the duty to safeguard the water both on and beneath the Earth’s surface, and in the process, safeguard the rights of people within the community of Barnstead, and the rights of the ecosystems of which Barnstead is a part...”

In quick succession three more towns in NH passed similar ordinances and the following year two towns in Maine did so as well. You can read the full Barnstead ordinance here. 

"We praise the residents of Toledo Ohio for expanding this rights-based strategy to apply to the whole Lake Erie ecosystem," said AfD's Ruth Caplan, who brought the rights-based approach to Barnstead.

Alliance members in Oregon and Massachusetts have been working on ballot questions that take on campaign finance reform and Citizens United, and on Election Day, those efforts paid off.
In Portland, the Alliance for Democracy chapter worked to pass a city charter amendment establishing limits on campaign contributions/expenditures. The Honest Elections charter amendment will add donation limits to the city charter, including a $500 limit on donations from individuals, and a limit of $5,000 on loans from candidates to their own campaigns. It also mandates disclosure by name of funders for campaign ads and other communications, along with the industry they represent.

The measure passed 87% to 12%, with about three-quarters of the votes counted as of Wednesday.

This Portland ballot measure is based on an earlier county-wide ballot question, which passed in 2016 with almost 90% support. Unfortunately, implementation of this measure is currently tied up in the court system, where a judge has ruled that the measure's limit on individual donations is a violation of state protection of free speech.

Oregon is a campaign finance cellar-dweller, second only to Mississippi in terms of regulation, and scoring nearly straight Fs in a 2015 study of state anti-corruption initiatives. (The Koch-funded "Institute for Free Speech," on the other hand, gives Oregon an A for having the "best" system of campaign finance regulation, that is to say none).

As a result, it takes a lot of money to run for office in Oregon, with donations coming mostly from developers, timber companies, and finance. Oregon state legislature candidates raise and spend more money, per capita, than candidates in any other state, except for New Jersey.

In Massachusetts, several Alliance members worked on the “Yes on 2” campaign. Proposed by American Promise, Question 2 supports a federal amendment to overturn Citizens United, and creates a "citizen's commission" to "investigate and report on the effects Citizens United and similar court cases have had on our political discourse."

Massachusetts democracy activists remember how their legislature blocked a Clean Elections initiative, and how the state's public banking study commission was quickly dominated by big banks who decided a public bank was unnecessary. Having already passed more than 200 local resolutions for an amendment, they weren't surprised that Question 2 passed—with with 72% of the vote—but they expect the real campaign will be to get a commission appointed quickly, and have it include activists from grassroots groups. Stay tuned!

How will you stop the war machine?

The US has been at war for 93% of its history, not counting covert actions. Its military budget is by far the largest in the world at more than $600 billion, spending supported by Democrats and Republicans alike.

But national and global peace movements are at work too, building broad-based, grassroots, intersectional movements against militarism and its ills. National and international actions include Keep Space for Peace Week, the Women's March on the Pentagon, the November 10 Peace Congress: End the Wars at Home and Abroad, and the First International Conference Against US/NATO Military Bases in Dublin. Alliance co-Chair Nancy Price will be attending both the DC and the Dublin conferences.

We hope to bring you updates and ideas for local organizing. Solidarity events are being planned for the Women's March on the Pentagon. A local event can be as simple as an evening or Saturday afternoon standout at a busy intersection, or a larger event with speakers working for economic justice, better health care and education, or climate protection--all areas seriously impacted by the US addiction to war and big military budgets. Or write a letter to the editor, an excellent way for one person to impact the public consciousness on war and peace.

And if you are attending candidate events, ask these questions:

1. Do you support cutting military spending and redirecting that money toward much-needed domestic programs? What would you cut and how much? Where would you reallocate that funding? 

2. Do you support auditing the Pentagon as outlined in the People's Budget and the Audit the Pentagon Act, in order to reduce waste and fraud?

3. Nuclear weapons stockpiles have shrunk since the height of the Cold War but no nation with nuclear weapons joined in the effort to negotiate and pass the recent UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Do you support nuclear disarmament? Do you think it is achievable? In the meantime, would you support legislation prohibiting the President from using the Armed Forces to conduct a first-use nuclear strike unless expressly authorized by a congressional declaration?